← Search

Katie Bark

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bozeman, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 13W–16L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history29 matches
L
2025-08-19 · 55s Q Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacie Wunsch
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-09 · Oakey's · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Barber
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-08 · Oakey's · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Williams
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-04 · 55s Q Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacie Wunsch
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-26 · Oakey's · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Ogle
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-25 · Oakey's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Nelson
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-18 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-08-18 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Bishop
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-17 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Barber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-08-16 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Waters
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-09-04 · Vintage Pearls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Chrisler
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2023-08-15 · Vintage Pearls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Oakes
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.7% of games
8.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.6% of games
9.0
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer