← Search

Ann Chrisler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BOZEMAN, MT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 12W–14L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history26 matches
L
2025-06-15 · Miller Time · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Vinton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-14 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-13 · Miller Time · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Vinton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Deborah Davis / Lena Grotz
2024-10-20 · Big Sky Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Miller championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-10-19 · Big Sky Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cyndy Desin championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-19 · Big Sky Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DIANA RAIMONDO championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
Susan Smith / Nancy Paregien
2024-10-18 · Big Sky Women · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cyndy Desin championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-05 · Big Sky Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ritva Porter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-08-05 · Big Sky Women · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DIANA RAIMONDO
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-08-01 · Fried Legs · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Vinton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-27 · Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Scott championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
Jenette Curran / Julia Romanin
2024-01-27 · Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cyndy Desin championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 51.6% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova