← Search

Martha MacKer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simi Valley, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 5W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
W
2026-09-27 · I’d Hit That · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Toone mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-11-09 · Sunset All Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berger
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-26 · WC V - WR Hot Flashes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica List
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-22 · Sunset All Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabella Richards
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-20 · WC V - WR Hot Flashes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Eisenbrand
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-08 · Sunset All Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berger
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-18 · Sunset All Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berger
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-02 · Sunset All Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Berger
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-02-09 · Sunset All Day · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Lawrence
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-01-25 · Sunset All Day · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Vazquez
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-03-06 · V - Sunset Hills Battle Cats · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mauricio Perez mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-02-09 · V - Sunset Hills Battle Cats · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Currey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 14.3% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#1 Singles
10%
2 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert