← Search

Daniel Shlossman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rockledge, FL
3.5M year-end 2023
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
17 matches · 12W–5L · seasons 2019–2021
Match history17 matches
W
2020-10-19 · Palmer-King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2020-09-11 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2020-09-04 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Seguine mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2020-08-31 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-08-28 · Palmer-King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maegan Hulscher mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2020-08-15 · Palmer-King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2020-08-10 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
2020-07-21 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Seguine mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2020-07-20 · Palmer-King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
W
2019-08-22 · Brevard - Rockledge/King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2019-07-23 · Brevard - Rockledge/King · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracy King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2019-07-09 · Brevard - Rockledge/King · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Shlossman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King