← Search

Margaret Mickel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 27W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
W
2026-06-03 · CCV Long · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Trigg
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · CCV Long · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eleanor Wellford
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-18 · CCV Long · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eleanor Wellford
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · CCV Long · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Sweeney
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-20 · CCV Long · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Trigg
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-06 · CCV Long · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Sweeney
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-02 · CCV Long 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-20 · CCV Long 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-19 · CCV Long 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-04-28 · CCV Long 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-17 · CCV Long 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-04-14 · CCV Long 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Croke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 49.2% of games
8.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe