← Search

Shery Cassidy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Windermere, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 77W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history142 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with FABRICIA FUNES
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Tormey
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Kinder
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Lake Cane-Tuckerman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with FABRICIA FUNES
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Orange/Bottinelli · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Orange/Bottinelli · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Orange/Bottinelli · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Miller championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Barritt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-17 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Myers
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Lake Cane-Barritt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Jay
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · Orange/Bottinelli · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
43.2%
32W–42L · 45.6% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 59.6% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 58.5% of games
9.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.6% of games
9.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer