← Search

James Engel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Roselle, IL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 77W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history122 matches
W
Default
2026-04-26 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 9.Naper Podwika Sun 4:30 $24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Danson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-12 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 9.Naper Podwika Sun 4:30 $24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Gonzalez
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · CDTA W 55&OM8.0 3.Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Reece
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-6
L
2026-03-14 · CDTA W 55&OM8.0 3.Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Goldner
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · CDTA W 55&OM8.0 3.Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregg Cook
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-21 · CDTA W 55&OM8.0 3.Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Goldner
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-02-07 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 9.Naper Podwika Sun 4:30 $24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Gatz
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-10 · CDTA W 55&OM8.0 3.Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dal Bristow
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-25 · CDTA E 55&OM8.0 2Naper Podwika Sat 12 $24 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dal Bristow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-04-21 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 5.Centre Court Zeigler Sun 12 $20 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-03-10 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 5.Centre Court Zeigler Sun 12 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Kao
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2024-03-03 · CDTA W 40&OM4.0 5.Centre Court Zeigler Sun 12 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Guy Jang
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
69%
49W–22L · 56.4% of games
7.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 53.9% of games
8.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova