← Search

Andrew Vodden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, KY
3.5M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
36 matches · 18W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history36 matches
L
2026-06-11 · Hagood/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holli Cox mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-27 · Hagood/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Lovelace mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · Hagood/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keo Jur mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-25 · Helton/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Bozman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-22 · Hagood/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Jilton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-07-10 · Hagood/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ju Mo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-29 · MUKHERJEE/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Soma Mukherjee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-15 · MUKHERJEE/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Soma Mukherjee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-06-12 · Hagood/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Cook mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-02 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Soma Mukherjee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-07-22 · Mukherjee/META · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Soma Mukherjee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2023-07-19 · AddisonMETA · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 76.6% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova