← Search

Sandra Cook

— year-end
60 matches · 31W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sandra Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Blackburn/META · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary DiSantis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Hagood6.5/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Keo Jur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-30 · Johnson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · Stewart/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · MUKHERJEE-EWING/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Zhang55/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Rossa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Hagood3.5/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Thacker/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Beth Shults-kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 58.5% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 33.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.3% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 48.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal