← Search

Janet McLellan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
VENICE, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 21W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-10-26 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marylynn Miles
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-12 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Babb
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-09 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Gregory
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-02 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alaine Troisi
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-23 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Sleet
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-09 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Gregory
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-26 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hurman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-12 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Gregory
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-05 · IslandWalk Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hurman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-02 · IslandWalk Quandt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Hurman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-03-26 · IslandWalk Quandt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne McIntosh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-19 · IslandWalk Quandt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne McIntosh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games
7.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer