← Search

Nick Eitel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seattle, WA
4.0S year-end 2024
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
10 matches · 8W–2L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history10 matches
L
2026-10-04 · NWW-STC-La Cava · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Mulberg championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-03 · NWW-STC-La Cava · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Mulberg championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · NWW-STC-La Cava · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald Mulberg championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-06 · NWW-STC-La Cava · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Popplewell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-05-07 · NWW-STC-La Cava · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Hunt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · STC-La Cava · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Sennett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-27 · STC-La Cava · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marc Reguera
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-5
L
2022-09-09 · NWW-STC-Young · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Barnes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2018-09-30 · STC-Barnes55 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Maloney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2018-09-22 · STC-Barnes55 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Barnes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.8% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams