← Search

Daniel Watson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simpsonville, SC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 12W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-18 · UPTA40C/Bartlett/Holly Tree · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Schmeissing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · UPTA40C/Bartlett/Holly Tree · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Bartlett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · UPTA55M/Dreiding/Holly Tree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Rabel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · UPTA55M/Dreiding/Holly Tree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vera McCray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · UPTA55M/Dreiding/Holly Tree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gera Mort mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · UPTA55M/Dreiding/Holly Tree · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirby King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · UPTA40A/Pandya/Hollytree · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raj Pandya
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · UPTA40A/Pandya/Hollytree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jay Swetenburg
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jimmy ten Pas
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-22 · UPTA40A/Pandya/Hollytree · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Belton Thomason
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-07-23 · UPTA55M/Dreiding/Holly Tree · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirby King mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.6% of games
4.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 31.6% of games
7.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.9% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 38.9% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.7% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams