Search

Eileen Francisco

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
146 matches · 86W–60L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.5
89%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.0
18 of 22
WA · 4.0
559 of 782

Eileen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eileen has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Eileen has gone from the 45th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
47.6%
30W–33L · 49% of games
7.0
80%
12W–3L · 60.2% of games
8.0
75%
30W–10L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgann Crook
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hudson
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Tanya Bond / Abigail Bond
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Simm
+0.033better than expected — took 42% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Misa Banks / Hong Vo
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
0.019below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Chan
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin Mattson
0.008below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
KuiCha Davison / Kathy Loken
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin Mattson
0.017about as expected — took 68% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karin Mattson
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teri Johnson
0.014about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Eidsaune
+0.003better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loreal ARGYLE
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.