← Search

Eitan Fattal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Encino, CA
4.5T year-end 2025
i
Tournament Exclusive — rating from tournament play only
23 matches · 17W–6L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history23 matches
L
2023-01-28 · SFV Love Love Tennis · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cindy Baw mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-11-23 · SGV-LLW- Dare Doubles-SFlores/BMinor-Arcadia Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jasmine Dai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2019-11-17 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Rooker
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2019-11-03 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Rooker
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2019-11-02 · SGV-LLW- Dare Doubles-SFlores/BMinor-Arcadia Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2019-10-27 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Talbot
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2019-10-13 · SGV-LLW- Dare Doubles-SFlores/BMinor-Arcadia Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-10-13 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Seong Cho
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2019-10-05 · SGV-LLW- Dare Doubles-SFlores/BMinor-Arcadia Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cara Hofstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2019-09-29 · SGV DARE DOUBLES 4.5-3.5M - TR.SF/ArcSu1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Max Seong Cho
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2019-09-28 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Talbot
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2019-09-22 · SGV Dare Doubles Men 4.0-SF/SU10am · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Rooker
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 62.6% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.5% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 70% of the time
#1 Doubles
70%
16 matches
#1 Singles
13%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal