← Search

Mark Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 7W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-10-02 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve White
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-11 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Justice
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-21 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gulyas
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Hibler
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-11 · NIN FW A 65&O 8.0 M: Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gulyas
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-09-19 · NIN FW A 65&O 8.0 M: Peterson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Hibler
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-22 · NIN FW A 65&O 8.0 M: Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Sullivan
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Sullivan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Hamlin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
Karl Veracco / Tom McDaniel
2025-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ed Minnich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ed Minnich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Hibler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer