← Search

Norman Peterson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 38W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history74 matches
W
2026-10-02 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Koehl
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · NIN FW A 55&O 8.0 M: WW Owens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gregory Ping
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · NIN FW A 55&O 8.0 M: WW Owens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shashank Kashyap
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · NIN FW A 55&O 8.0 M: WW Owens · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gulyas
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-05 · NIN FW A 65&O 8.0 M: Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Sullivan
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gulyas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Owens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gulyas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Owens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Krahn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-09-15 · NIN FW 65&O 7.0 M: WW Weybright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Scrogham
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-09-08 · NIN FW 65&O 7.0 M: WW Weybright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Kline
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.8% of games
4.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 53.4% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 50.5% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 69.2% of games
8.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal