← Search

Eric Webster

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 135W–62L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history197 matches
W
2026-10-24 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 8.0: Webster · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Milissa Bohlender mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-27 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Webster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin Parker
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Webster · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linying Xiao mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Webster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Stoney
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-29 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Webster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Stoney
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve White championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · NIN FW A 55&O 8.0 M: WW Lunsford/Stauffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Brown
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-05-12 · NIN FW A 55&O 8.0 M: WW Lunsford/Stauffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-19 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Webster · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linying Xiao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Webster · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa Cleveland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · NIN FW MXD 40&O 8.0: Webster/Downey · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Radke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-13 · NIN FW MXD 40&O 8.0: Webster/Downey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Stetzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.8%
45W–10L · 60.2% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.2% of games
8.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 72% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
64.8%
46W–25L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova