← Search

Bailey Buhrt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Syracuse, IN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 56W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history78 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Seale · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Metz championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-27 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Seale · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Metz
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Seale · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Metz
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW Fall 18&O Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0 M: Seale · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leon Brenneman
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 M: Concord Bond · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 M: Concord Bond · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 M: Concord Bond · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 M: Concord Bond · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · NIN SB 18&O 4.5 M: Concord Bond · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-04 · NIN FW Tri-Level 4.0,4.5,5.0 M: Seale/Brenneman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · NIN FW Tri-Level 4.0,4.5,5.0 M: Seale/Brenneman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Stallman
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 63% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.6% of games
4.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 61.3% of games
4.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.9% of games
8.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal