← Search

MacKenzie Morris

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salina, KS
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history13 matches
L
2025-03-08 · Osborne/Bulnes · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Kingry
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-08 · Osborne/Bulnes · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Kingry
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-01-21 · Bulnes - Salina · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-01-21 · Bulnes - Salina · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Mathew
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-07 · Bulnes - Salina · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Kingry
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-4
W
2024-01-07 · Bulnes - Salina · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Johnson
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-1
W
2023-08-13 · KS/Wegner/Jones/18&Over10.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Rafael Bulnes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-08-13 · KS/Wegner/Jones/18&Over10.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Rafael Bulnes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-07-30 · KS/Wegner/Jones/18&Over10.0MXD · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Rafael Bulnes mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2020-07-22 · Schick, Amie · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-07-07 · Schick, Amie · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2020-06-23 · Schick, Amie · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 46.9% of games
10.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#1 Singles
23%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert