← Search

Katie Cronin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 106W–125L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history231 matches
L
2026-10-04 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tyler Brody
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alicia Fink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-09 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Ferguson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-01 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dawn Tenev
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alicia Fink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-29 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Godfrey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen) · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-07-22 · SWhitney/KHarborne (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanne Joliet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen) · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · KCronin/Chapman (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Wellman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · SWhitney/KHarborne (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Pavleszek
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
62.7%
42W–25L · 53% of games
3.5
30.2%
19W–44L · 41.9% of games
5.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.5% of games
6.5
46.8%
22W–25L · 48.6% of games
3.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 48% of games
3.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
45 matches
#1 Singles
15%
34 matches
#2 Singles
11%
26 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe