← Search

Alicia Fink

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 111W–99L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-10-02 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenny Wilken
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanne Joliet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Coskey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-08 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathy Harborne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-04 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Brandt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-14 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Brandt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · LFerguson/RLee (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Abrams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hilary Lee championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-10-03 · EPease (Piper Glen) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Natterman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-01 · KCronin/Ferguson (Piper Glen) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Cronin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 52.8% of games
3.5
41%
25W–36L · 50.7% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
42W–21L · 55.4% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 37.1% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.2% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.4% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#1 Singles
10%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
18 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer