← Search

Matthew Fraenza

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
KILLINGWORTH, CT
4.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
27 matches · 15W–12L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history27 matches
L
2025-10-10 · GF:Mix Masters:Boone · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrea Goetz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-04 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Ponvert/Woods · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-14 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Ponvert/Woods · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-21 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Ponvert/Woods · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-01-24 · GF:Mixed Signals:Ponvert/Woods · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-12-13 · GF:Mixed Signals:Ponvert/Woods · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-10-04 · GF:Mixed Signals:Ponvert/Woods · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamelia Parker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-12 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Fasulo/Ponvert · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-05 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Fasulo/Ponvert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-03-15 · GF:Shanks and Pros:Fasulo/Ponvert · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dani Woods mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-11-03 · GF:Mixin Impossible:Fasulo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elisabeth Barsa mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-10-13 · GF:Mixin Impossible:Fasulo · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marissa Capasso mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams