← Search

Janine Dalva

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 86W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history167 matches
L
2026-11-02 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisabeth Parkinson
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA64/Mulholland/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madge Dennis
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-21 · LCTA64/Mulholland/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Montgomery
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer DeCamp
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madge Dennis
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-12 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madge Dennis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-09 · LCTA54/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Pitts
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · LCTA54/Montgomery/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charlotte Gerber
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-30 · LCTA64/Mulholland/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpenter
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-28 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer DeCamp
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · LCTA54/Montgomery/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Pitts
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA64/Mulholland/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Williamson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
54.2%
45W–38L · 51.3% of games
4.5
27.3%
9W–24L · 40% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.9% of games
8.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 30.1% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe