← Search

Jennifer DeCamp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johns Island, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 77W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history163 matches
L
2026-10-19 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Dalva
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpenter
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · LCTA54/Carpenter/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Medlock
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-28 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine Dalva
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-21 · LCTA39/Montgomery/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Carpenter
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Rayfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-2
W
2026-08-22 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Ott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · LCTA55/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Bruce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Gannon
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-06 · LCTA55/Gillespie/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Gannon
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.1% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.6% of games
4.0
49.2%
59W–61L · 50.6% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.8% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 53% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal