← Search

Mary Johnson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Newark, DE
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 29W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Team Ageless · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Deeney
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Team Ageless · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · Team Ageless · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Deeney
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Team Ageless · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Terri DeGarbolewski
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Deeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Deeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Kane
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
Lynn Fabian / Laura Johnson
2024-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Deeney
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Polly Cherundolo
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Cochran
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Bennett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2024-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Murphy
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 59.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 17.2% of games
6.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 62.8% of games
7.0
20%
3W–12L · 32.7% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams