← Search

Robert Edelstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chagrin Falls, OH
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 11W–4L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history15 matches
L
2024-07-01 · A55 8.0M CV Aten · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Kinnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-24 · A55 8.0M CV Aten · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Sues
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-17 · A55 8.0M CV Aten · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Kinnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2023-07-26 · OH NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Florman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2023-06-28 · OH NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Schloss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-06-21 · OH NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Lucci
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-07-14 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Schloss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-06-23 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-05-26 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Curtis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2021-06-28 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Shaw
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2021-06-21 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Schloss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-0
W
2021-05-24 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Schloss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
75%
9W–3L · 64.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 67% of the time
#2 Doubles
67%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer