← Search

Kevin Shaw

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MADISON, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 11W–6L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history17 matches
W
2023-06-07 · OH NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-05-31 · OH NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-07-26 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Curtis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-07-14 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Simone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-06-02 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Curtis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2021-07-19 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Callanan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-06-28 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Edelstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-06-07 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Curtis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-05-24 · A55 9.0M CRC Florman · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hoyt C Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2019-08-05 · NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marc Spector
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-07-23 · NEO A40 4.5M Wenger · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc Spector
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2019-07-22 · NEO A55 9.0M Florman · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Edelstein
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.5% of games
9.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert