← Search

T Thompson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oneida, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 73W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history131 matches
W
James Wilson / Chris Obenberger
2026-09-13 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Keck championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-13 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Keck championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
Jeffrey Cox / John Rowenczak
2026-09-12 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Tillison championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-12 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gary Irwin championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Canada championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
Joseph Becker / Mark Eisner
2026-09-11 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Lovell championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Arnold mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Carlson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Carlson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LuAnne Zelasko mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Thompson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · Thompson/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Goodwyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.5% of games
4.0
51.1%
23W–22L · 48.7% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.1% of games
3.5mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.1% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams