← Search

Scott Welch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 144W–72L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history216 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Shrivalle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Adams
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-10-04 · Shrivalle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eugene Spencer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-15 · Guske/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rob Manuel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-13 · Mihalik/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Peterson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · Mihalik/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Mihalik championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
Craig Leeper / Mark Eisner
2026-09-12 · Mihalik/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Duke championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
James Wilson / Joseph Becker
2026-09-11 · Mihalik/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Duke championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-09-11 · Mihalik/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harold Benson championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-08 · Guske/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Patterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · Guske/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Patterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Guske/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Patterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Griffin mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
3.5
83.7%
72W–14L · 64.5% of games
4.0
29.3%
12W–29L · 41.4% of games
6.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 62.6% of games
7.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.9% of games
3.5mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King