← Search

Nathan Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, KY
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 96W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-15 · KY/LOU/REEDER · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Holmes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Caroline Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Erin Fidler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
Dawson Do / Ignacio Vanecek Kaddour
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ankur Gopal championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijay Kannan championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijay Kannan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijay Kannan championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · KY/LOU/FIDLER/ZIPSE · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carolina Barboza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijay Kannan championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Hogue championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijay Kannan championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Bottorff championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.5% of games
4.5
65.3%
32W–17L · 56% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.7% of games
8.5
94.4%
17W–1L · 64.7% of games
4.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.4% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 60.8% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova