← Search

Florinda Cudiamat

VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
3.5S year-end 2026
52 matches · 24W–28L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Florinda sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Florinda is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Florinda has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Florinda has gone from the 41st to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
51.1%
24W–23L · 52.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 39% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
2023-10-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Griffin
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-4
W
Stacy Whitehead
2022-06-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
RACQUEL DIZON / Janet Nelson
2022-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shani Ma
−0.015about as expected — took 63% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Li
−0.029below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2022-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loc Nguyen
−0.027about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Rachael Boyle / Ashly Ryan
2022-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Zimmerman
−0.006about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krista Diaz
−0.033below expectation — took 43% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Lisa Chudd / Mary Stengel
2022-03-21 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
+0.019better than expected — took 42% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jan Willis / Marie Jocelyne Pink
2022-02-28 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krista Diaz
+0.015better than expected — took 45% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Laurie White / Frances Harr
2022-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Moy
−0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Sandie Mainwal-Price / Diane Paull
2021-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Baxter
−0.026below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2021-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Nelson
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.