← Search

Edward Barron

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairfield, CA
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 16W–53L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2026-09-19 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Johnson mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Valerie Blanchard mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Ross mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Caruso mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Thurston mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-28 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Ross mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-07 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Johnson mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-29 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Caruso mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-26 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Thurston mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-18 · IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 55MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gina Chen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-06 · GREEN VALLEY CC 18MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly McAlister mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-25 · GREEN VALLEY CC CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Schemke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 36.2% of games
7.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 36% of games
7.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–14L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams