← Search

Ellen Boyer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RANCHO MIRAGE, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 21W–52L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history73 matches
L
2026-02-12 · CV-Giacomini/Williams · #4 Doubles · with Janet Daniel
loading the estimate
0-4
L
2026-02-11 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane True
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-05 · CV-Giacomini/Williams · #5 Doubles · with Kathleen Novarro
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-28 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane True
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-22 · CV-Giacomini/Williams · #4 Doubles · with Renee Caldwell
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-14 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucia Bell
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-08 · CV-Giacomini/Williams · #4 Doubles · with Susan Markowitz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-26 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Ringer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-03 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Goldman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-26 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Moskowitz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-02-20 · CV-Giacomini · #4 Doubles · with Diane Fass
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-19 · CV-Mission Hills/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Robinow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 28.9% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
27%
10W–27L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#5 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer