← Search

Marianne Roth

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Quinta, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 8W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history19 matches
W
Default
2026-02-12 · CV-Ringer/Roth · #6 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Yazel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-05 · CV-Ringer/Roth · #6 Doubles · with Nancy Yazel
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-15 · CV-Ringer/Roth · #6 Doubles · with Nancy Yazel
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-20 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with MaryLynn Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-01-29 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo/Vrabek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-01-23 · CV-Ringer · #5 Doubles · with Nancy Yazel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-01-08 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo/Vrabek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-02-29 · CV-Ringer · #3 Doubles · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-02-22 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with Jane Engles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-21 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo & Vrabek · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-15 · CV-Ringer · #5 Doubles · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-07 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo & Vrabek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Vrabek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#6 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#5 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer