← Search

Jane Engles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Quinta, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 7W–22L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history29 matches
L
2024-03-29 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Day
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-25 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Creager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2024-03-04 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Holmes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-02-27 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with Theresa Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-22 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with Marianne Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-02-15 · CV-Ringer · #3 Doubles · with Sandra House
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-29 · CV-Rancho La Quinta /N Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-01-25 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with Fay Zuccato
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-24 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo & Vrabek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Haugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-01-18 · CV-Ringer · #4 Doubles · with Theresa Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-17 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo & Vrabek · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Haley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-10 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Sabo & Vrabek · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Haugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova