← Search

Linzy Fattoruso

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rancho Mirage, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 7W–16L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history23 matches
L
2025-03-19 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Schwalbe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sallie Cutler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-07 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Schwalbe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sallie Cutler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-06 · CV-Willsey · #4 Doubles · with Hiyam van der Wilde
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-22 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Schwalbe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sallie Cutler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-08 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Schwalbe · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sallie Cutler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-02-13 · CV-Parkerson · #4 Doubles · with Gina Orban
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-04 · CV-Parkerson · #3 Doubles · with Marsha Burke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-03-09 · CV-Mission Hills/Abend & Hawley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Devereaux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2020-02-24 · CV-Mission Hills/Abend & Hawley · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Devereaux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2020-02-20 · CV-Parkerson & Summers · #2 Doubles · with Ellen Boyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2020-02-18 · CV-Mission Hills/Abend & Hawley · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Devereaux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2020-02-13 · CV-Parkerson & Summers · #2 Doubles · with Memie Nichols
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.4% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer