← Search

NICHOLAS BIGGS

— year-end
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 2021–2023

Captains: add NICHOLAS BIGGS to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
Spencer Jacoby / Joshua Ruse
2023-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Ochsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Kyle Bydlon / Alexander Buscaglia
2023-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mick Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Ryan Brown / Benjamin Fahrbach
2021-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Piekarsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Scott Evans / Christopher Layton
2021-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sungyun Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2021-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Piekarsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
Alex Thomas / Jonah Haley
2021-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keyawn Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
James Hoffman / James Daly
2021-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Piekarsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2021-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Garret Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-8
L
2021-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Garret Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-9
L
2021-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Garret Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
W
Mario Cuauhtemoc Vargas / Josh Husmann
2021-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keyawn Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Axel Haupt / Derek Ringer
2021-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams1 team
CIN Indianapolis Tri -Level Piekarsky
Summer Usta Central Indiana Tri-Level Series · 3.5 4.0 4.5 Men
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal