Search

Terry Saeger

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 77W–96L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Terry Saeger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-08-24 · SFredericks (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · SFredericks (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Carnahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-10 · MCTA40/Ruggerio/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Carnahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · JCarnahan (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nataliya Rubanenko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · MCTA40/Ruggerio/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Unterberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · MCTA40/Ruggerio/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Unterberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Randy Myers / David Helmschamps
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · with David Drossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Robert Robinson / Shaun Kruse
2026-04-27 · SFredericks (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · GBeal (GCC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phillip Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
David Bowman / Michael Rousseaux
2026-04-13 · SFredericks (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gordon Mcclellan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.8% of games
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 57.9% of games
3.5
45%
27W–33L · 46.9% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 25% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 56% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.8% of games
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.3% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova