← Search

Derek Novacek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Covina, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 5W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-01-11 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Ponnaganti/Diamond Bar HS/SA10: · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-09 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pavan Akkimsetty
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandeep Kamalon
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Lopez
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-19 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Lopez
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-09-28 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russel Segawa
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-21 · SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHENG QIAN
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-15 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SA1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Martinez
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-08 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Martinez
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-04-20 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SA1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sushant Mish
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-11-17 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amit Patel
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-03 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Ponnaganti-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ramesh Bandaru
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 42.3% of games
4.0
7.7%
1W–12L · 32% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Singles
16%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert