← Search

Bill Barker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SARASOTA, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 5W–11L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history16 matches
W
2024-06-22 · IA/Mahoski/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Mahoski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2022-11-13 · Russell/Mahoski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Gambon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-12 · IA/Mahoski/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Bryant
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-13 · Russell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Bryant
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-12-12 · Russell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Gambon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-11-14 · Russell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Mahoski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2020-11-21 · Johnson - QCTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-10-17 · Johnson - QCTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Smith
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2020-01-04 · Johnson - QCTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Lewis
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2019-12-07 · Johnson - QCTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Bryant
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2019-11-17 · Bryant/Mahoski - QCTC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roger Dolleslager
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2018-12-08 · Johnson - QCTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Smith
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 35.7% of games
8.0
50%
5W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal