← Search

Laura Fenton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Surprise, AZ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 35W–26L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-10-17 · 4.5 PTC4 Kinney% W55F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diane Taylor
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-10-12 · 4.5 AGCC1 Solomon W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Maxwell
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · 4.5 PTC4 Kinney% W55F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Reusing
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-05 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Salmon
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-16 · 8.0 PAS Deglane X40S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ramanatha Sharma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-12 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Salmon
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-02-10 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cindy Fonseca
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-05 · 4.5 PTC Fonseca W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susie Vanderwey
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-13 · 4.5 AGCC SOL Anthem CC Ironwood W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Pacione
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-25 · 8.0 PAS Deglane X40S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Cramer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-10 · IE-CCCC-Sharon Hebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelley Mellentine
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2023-05-07 · Caliente Stockdale W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vanessa Bennett
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 52.3% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.3% of games
9.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams