Teams

SATL40/Hochet/YMCA

USTA Adult 40 & Over (3.0-4.5) · Men - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-07vs SATL40/WLi/SACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Schulz / Nigel Cox vs James Ball / Robert Hanks4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Wilkins / William Hochet vs Alan Lyles / Lee Zuber6-2, 6-2
2026-04-23vs SATL40/WLi/SACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hochet / Eric Schulz vs James Ball / Lee Zuber6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNigel Cox / Thomas Stewart vs Wei Li / Alan Lyles3-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs SATL40/WLi/SACWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Schulz / William Hochet vs James Ball / Travis Greer6-0, 7-6
2026-04-02vs SATL40/WLi/SACLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Schulz / Nigel Cox vs Wei Li / Jamie Catalano3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGerhard Seyffer / Jack Bucher vs Alan Lyles / Benny Poon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-26vs SATL40/WLi/SACLost 02
L#1 DoublesGerhard Seyffer / Joshua Wilkins vs James Ball / Lee Zuber6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Thompson / Jack Bucher vs Travis Greer / Rob Hickerson3-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs SATL40/WLi/SACLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Schulz / Doug Clark vs James Ball / Alan Lyles3-6, 1-6
2026-03-12vs SATL40/WLi/SACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Schulz / Thomas Stewart vs Alan Lyles / James Ball3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJack Bucher / William Hochet vs Wei Li / Travis Greer2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL40/WLi/SAC52101123185
2SATL40/Hochet/YMCA2571429205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
William Hochet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Gerhard Seyffer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Eric Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Thomas Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Doug Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Frank Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jack Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Nigel Cox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Clark + Jack Bucher2343% gamesnot enough data
Frank Thompson + Jack Bucher224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Hochet
46W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Gerhard Seyffer
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Eric Schulz
13W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Thomas Stewart
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Doug Clark
16W–20L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Frank Thompson
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jack Bucher
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Nigel Cox
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.