Teams

SATL40/WLi/SAC

USTA Adult 40 & Over (3.0-4.5) · Men - 4.0

5 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-07vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Ball / Robert Hanks vs Eric Schulz / Nigel Cox6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlan Lyles / Lee Zuber vs Joshua Wilkins / William Hochet2-6, 2-6
2026-04-23vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Ball / Lee Zuber vs William Hochet / Eric Schulz4-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCALost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Ball / Travis Greer vs Eric Schulz / William Hochet0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBenny Poon / Rob Hickerson vs Nigel Cox / Joshua Wilkins3-6, 2-6
2026-04-02vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCAWon 10
W#1 DoublesWei Li / Jamie Catalano vs Eric Schulz / Nigel Cox6-3, 6-2
2026-03-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesJames Ball / Lee Zuber vs Gerhard Seyffer / Joshua Wilkins7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTravis Greer / Rob Hickerson vs Frank Thompson / Jack Bucher6-3, 6-1
2026-03-19vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesWei Li / Jamie Catalano vs Nigel Cox / Joshua Wilkins6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Ball / Alan Lyles vs Eric Schulz / Doug Clark6-3, 6-1
2026-03-12vs SATL40/Hochet/YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesAlan Lyles / James Ball vs Eric Schulz / Thomas Stewart3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenny Poon / Rob Hickerson vs Nigel Cox / Joshua Wilkins1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWei Li / Travis Greer vs Jack Bucher / William Hochet6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATL40/WLi/SAC52101123185
2SATL40/Hochet/YMCA2571429205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jamie Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
James Ball
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.58
Lee Zuber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Travis Greer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Rob Hickerson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Greer + Jamie Catalano5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Catalano
24W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
James Ball
22W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Lee Zuber
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.58
Travis Greer
20W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Rob Hickerson
27W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.