Teams

Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-07vs Earley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Samantha Harlow vs Dabney Porter / Beverly Tuttle7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Lynne Murray vs Gina Goy / Chetana Honnarayanahalli6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKatie Shane vs Sayaka Matsuoka6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Claire Parsons vs Adriana Hernandez / Alejandra Hernandez Medel1-6, 4-6
2026-04-30vs Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Kelly Lombardino vs Cari Powell / Marla Barnwell5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSamantha Harlow vs Linda Helms2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Brenda Willis / Heidi Wrisley7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesHannah Higgins vs Dia Roberts3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Shane / Caroline McAlister vs Erin Richardson / Kelly Gekas6-2, 6-1
2026-04-23vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Lauren Ivey vs Ginny Lewis / Annabel Weyand Norman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Amy Gilbert6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Shane / Samantha Harlow vs Thanawan Hahn / Kate Meiners2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Higgins / Claire Parsons vs Melissa Agner / Jane Owens2-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs Earley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMWon 40
W#1 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Kelly Lombardino vs Rhyssa Earley / Virginia Easley6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Ann Martel6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatie Shane / Lynne Murray vs Dabney Porter / Beverly Tuttle6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Sayaka Matsuoka / Yukari Matsuoka6-2, 7-6
2026-04-09vs Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Lynne Murray vs Dia Roberts / Linda Helms6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Sarah Cline6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Katie Shane vs Cari Powell / Sarah Dunning4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHannah Higgins / Claire Parsons vs Heidi Wrisley / Leah Weinberger6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-02vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Lauren Ivey vs Tiffany Brown / Kate Meiners3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSamantha Harlow vs Allison Johnson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Shane / Hannah Higgins vs Nancy Benda / Ginny Lewis0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Nancy Cobb6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMadison Bowen / Kristin Williamson vs Lindsay Ray / Amy Gilbert6-0, 6-2
2026-03-26vs Earley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristin Williamson / Kelly Lombardino vs Rhyssa Earley / Brittany Furr6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Ann Martel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Lynne Murray vs Gina Goy / Chetana Honnarayanahalli6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHannah Higgins vs Rolinde Cleyman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Shane / Caroline McAlister vs Sayaka Matsuoka / Yukari Matsuoka3-6, 0-6
2026-03-21vs Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 14
L#1 DoublesKelly Lombardino / Katie Shane vs Tiffany Brown / Kate Meiners1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Nancy Cobb7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristin Williamson / Caroline McAlister vs Denise Speight / Melissa Agner0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSamantha Harlow vs Allison Johnson1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Bowen / Hannah Higgins vs Annabel Weyand Norman / Thanawan Hahn2-6, 2-6
2026-03-19vs Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Claire Parsons vs Leah Weinberger / Erin Huffines6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Harlow vs Sarah Cline6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatie Shane / Kelly Lombardino vs Mimi Cartee / Marla Barnwell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMolly Ehrig vs Carrie McElvogue6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Brenda Willis / Sarah Dunning2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WOMEN 4.5 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gill 18s 4.5W Wed AM803739181
2Speight 18s 4.5W Thurs PM8138717186
3Wrisley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM63212454428
4Strassell/Mays 18s 4.5W Wed AM44162452379
5Milam 18s 4.5W Thurs PM36212450387
6Earley 18s 4.5W Thurs PM18103575491
7Jones 18s 4.5W Wed AM0873370452

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Molly Ehrig
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.98
Jessica Bair-Epps
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.94
Kelly Lombardino
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.94
Samantha Harlow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.91
Kristin Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.90
Lauren Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Katie Shane
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #2 Singles 24% · published
3.73
Lynne Murray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Hannah Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.68
Claire Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Caroline McAlister
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Madison Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Nancye Milam
published
Martha Benbow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Williamson + Madison Bowen16365% games+14.7% vs expected
Kelly Lombardino + Katie Shane134 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Jessica Bair-Epps314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lombardino + Jessica Bair-Epps213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lombardino + Kristin Williamson033 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Caroline McAlister213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Shane + Caroline McAlister123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Ehrig
25W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Jessica Bair-Epps
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Kelly Lombardino
6W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
Samantha Harlow
10W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Lauren Ivey
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Katie Shane
24W–21L career · 15 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Lynne Murray
161W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Hannah Higgins
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Claire Parsons
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Caroline McAlister
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Madison Bowen
30W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Nancye Milam
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Martha Benbow
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.