Teams

HMTC BLUE

2025 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-26vs FCCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJameel Chohan / Thomas Munoz vs Joseph Lillis / Paul Gronewoller1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEric Chambers vs Gregory Gibbs1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesForest Dixon / Alan Krech vs Mark Kramer / Matthew Hoeven1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-19vs CSU GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesJameel Chohan / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Jim Kelly / David van Thuyne6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesForest Dixon / Matthew Solley vs Peter Corran / Mark Sundstedt6-3, 6-4
2025-04-12vs MLF NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesSebastian Baumgaertel / Jameel Chohan vs Jeff Brauch / Wil Buchanan6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEric Chambers vs Benjamin Schlicting0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Krech / Matthew Solley vs Tyler Hempstead / David Trevino1-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs FCCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSebastian Baumgaertel / Thomas Munoz vs Josh Shelby / Mark Kramer6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEric Chambers vs Gregory Gibbs0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Krech / Forest Dixon vs Paul Gronewoller / Matthew Hoeven6-2, 6-4
2025-03-29vs CSU GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesJameel Chohan / Sebastian Baumgaertel vs Michael Baker / Jim Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesThomas Munoz vs Dan Bikos6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlan Krech / Forest Dixon vs Peter Corran / David van Thuyne3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jameel Chohan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Thomas Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Matthew Solley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Alan Krech
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Forest Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Gary Westlind
published 3.5
Eric Chambers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sebastian Baumgaertel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forest Dixon + Alan Krech3344% games−7.4% vs expected
Jameel Chohan + Sebastian Baumgaertel123 matchesnot enough data
Jameel Chohan + Matthew Solley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jameel Chohan
32W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Thomas Munoz
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Matthew Solley
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Alan Krech
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
Forest Dixon
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Gary Westlind
15W–62L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Eric Chambers
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sebastian Baumgaertel
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.