Teams

MLF NAVY

2025 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyler Hempstead / Wil Buchanan vs Jim Kelly / Michael Baker6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAdam Less vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Schlicting / William Freet vs Dan Bikos / Peter Corran6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-12vs HMTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Brauch / Wil Buchanan vs Sebastian Baumgaertel / Jameel Chohan0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Schlicting vs Eric Chambers6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTyler Hempstead / David Trevino vs Alan Krech / Matthew Solley6-1, 6-3
2025-04-05vs CSU GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesTyler Hempstead / Wil Buchanan vs Peter Corran / Jim Kelly6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Schlicting / Jeff Brauch vs Mark Sundstedt / Kelley Axe6-3, 6-1
2025-03-29vs FCCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesWil Buchanan / Tyler Hempstead vs Josh Shelby / Joseph Lillis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Schlicting vs Gregory Gibbs4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Less / William Freet vs Paul Gronewoller / Mark Kramer6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MLF NAVY3210513106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Adam Less
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.88
Benjamin Schlicting
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Wil Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Tyler Hempstead
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
David Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
William Freet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Joe Ashbee
published 4
Jeff Brauch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Hempstead + Wil Buchanan7361% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Less
76W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Benjamin Schlicting
25W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Wil Buchanan
32W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Tyler Hempstead
68W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
4
David Trevino
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
William Freet
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Joe Ashbee
80W–50L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jeff Brauch
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.