Teams

NOGTA/Noah Cleary

2025 NOGTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Men 8.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-05vs WellsWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Draghiceanu / Jacob Quast vs Jack Sismour / Zac Raughton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJacob Summerville / Carl Phillips vs Gregorio Rojas / Gary Quast6-1, 6-4
2025-06-28vs WellsWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdis Krnjic / Chad Frank vs Drew Mosteller / Benny Ashley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNoah Cleary / David Draghiceanu vs Jordan Wells / Phil Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShazman Ali / Jacob Summerville vs Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal / Gregorio Rojas7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-21vs WellsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLuke Stanley / Blaine Greeson vs Phil Johnson / Gregorio Rojas6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarl Phillips / Jacob Quast vs Zac Raughton / Benny Ashley6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-14vs WellsWon 30
W#1 DoublesShazman Ali / Edis Krnjic vs Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal / Drew Mosteller7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNoah Cleary / Blaine Greeson vs Gary Quast / Gregorio Rojas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChad Frank / Lance Watson vs Zac Raughton / Jack Sismour6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chad Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
David Draghiceanu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Blaine Greeson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Edis Krnjic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Jacob Summerville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Shazman Ali
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Carl Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Jacob Quast
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Luke Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Cleary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Quast + Shazman Ali033 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Quast + Edis Krnjic303 matchesnot enough data
Shazman Ali + Edis Krnjic123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chad Frank
2W–0L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Draghiceanu
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Blaine Greeson
20W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Edis Krnjic
39W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jacob Summerville
20W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Shazman Ali
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Carl Phillips
13W–4L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jacob Quast
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Luke Stanley
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noah Cleary
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.