Teams

Wells

2025 NOGTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Men 8.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-05vs NOGTA/Noah ClearyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJack Sismour / Zac Raughton vs David Draghiceanu / Jacob Quast2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGregorio Rojas / Gary Quast vs Jacob Summerville / Carl Phillips1-6, 4-6
2025-06-28vs NOGTA/Noah ClearyLost 03
L#1 DoublesDrew Mosteller / Benny Ashley vs Edis Krnjic / Chad Frank4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Wells / Phil Johnson vs Noah Cleary / David Draghiceanu2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal / Gregorio Rojas vs Shazman Ali / Jacob Summerville6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-21vs NOGTA/Noah ClearyLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhil Johnson / Gregorio Rojas vs Luke Stanley / Blaine Greeson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZac Raughton / Benny Ashley vs Carl Phillips / Jacob Quast1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-14vs NOGTA/Noah ClearyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal / Drew Mosteller vs Shazman Ali / Edis Krnjic6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGary Quast / Gregorio Rojas vs Noah Cleary / Blaine Greeson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZac Raughton / Jack Sismour vs Chad Frank / Lance Watson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Benny Ashley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Gary Quast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Jack Sismour
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.08
Jordan Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Phil Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Drew Mosteller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gregorio Rojas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Zac Raughton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Wells + Benny Ashley3249% games−0.2% vs expected
Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benny Ashley
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Jack Sismour
12W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Jordan Wells
25W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.08
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Drew Mosteller
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregorio Rojas
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zac Raughton
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.