Teams

NJ NAVY

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs HIW GOLDLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Harper / Lee Duhl vs Doreen Evans / Laura Billups2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Lochner vs Sue Speyer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Mary Bare vs Nora Alby / Susie Shipley4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWanda Shepherd / Elizabeth Shields vs Nicole Reyes / Deborah Simon6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-07-17vs LTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristy Carello / Heidi Warriner vs Nancy Driver / Pamela Schmidt6-2, 1-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Lochner vs April Kobayashi6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Duhl / Elizabeth Shields vs Ellen Muller / Linda Sexton1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Bare / Cynthia Snavely vs Karla Henkart / Jennifer Garbiso Hall7-5, 6-3
2021-07-15vs EPR NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHelen Hock / Cynthia Snavely vs Gwen Riley / Karen Morris4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJulie Lochner vs Jennifer Halboth7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Duhl / Mary Bare vs Kellie Bonthron / Susan Whatley1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristy Carello / Elizabeth Shields vs Alima Blackwell / Nancy Hiester6-3, 6-1
2021-07-08vs NJ BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Heidi Warriner vs STACEY OELTJENBRUNS / Marlene Swartz6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAngela Harper vs Michelle McKenzie6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNatalie Cervera / Lee Duhl vs Nancy Stapp / Becky Myers1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Hock / Kathy Peterson vs Michelle Gibbs / Patricia Billinger0-6, 1-6
2021-06-24vs BP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAngela Harper / Heidi Warriner vs Katie Shaw / Alison Shaw6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristy Carello vs Judith Law6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Cervera / Julie Lochner vs Katie Todd / Donna Cash6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Helen Hock vs Sylvia Johansen / Helen Peterman6-3, 6-3
2021-06-17vs RHCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHeidi Warriner / Kathy Peterson vs Stephanie Joens / Catherine Rossano2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Carello vs Michele Castle6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Bare / Natalie Cervera vs Julia McVey / Valerie VanAlsburg2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLee Duhl / Cynthia Snavely vs Susan Weese / Katie Wither6-3, 7-5
2021-06-10vs MC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCynthia Snavely / Heidi Warriner vs Ellen Davis / Kristin Harvey6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie Lochner vs Roline Rosen3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Hock / Natalie Cervera vs Roberta Barolat / Lauren Arnold6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Carello / Elizabeth Shields vs Peggy Hofstra / Natalie Sanso2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Heidi Warriner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Angela Harper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Julie Lochner
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.28
Cynthia Snavely
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Christy Carello
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Wanda Shepherd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Helen Hock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.62
Elizabeth Shields
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lee Duhl
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Bare
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Natalie Cervera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Snavely + Heidi Warriner4167% games+13.9% vs expected
Cynthia Snavely + Wanda Shepherd8361% games+10.5% vs expected
Cynthia Snavely + Lee Duhl3450% games+8.5% vs expected
Heidi Warriner + Angela Harper6164% games+7.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Shields + Christy Carello4450% games+4.9% vs expected
Julie Lochner + Angela Harper4156% games+2.5% vs expected
Mary Bare + Julie Lochner4261% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathy Peterson + Heidi Warriner4154% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Warriner
80W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Angela Harper
77W–79L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Julie Lochner
113W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Snavely
78W–48L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christy Carello
36W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy Peterson
43W–89L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.15
Wanda Shepherd
39W–41L career · 1 line in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Helen Hock
39W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Elizabeth Shields
25W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
2.62
Lee Duhl
9W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Bare
30W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Cervera
18W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.