Teams

RHCC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs NJ BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Joens / Jessica Irwin vs Anne Leoni / Patricia Billinger6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichele Castle vs STACEY OELTJENBRUNS0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Weese / Sue Gallagher vs Nancy Stapp / Becky Myers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValerie VanAlsburg / Katie Wither vs MARCIE COOLIDGE / Michelle Gibbs6-1, 6-2
2021-07-15vs LTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan Weese / Sue Gallagher vs Nancy Driver / Linda Sexton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichele Castle vs Martha McNamara6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Joens / Katie Wither vs Vera Aaron / Ellen Muller6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Rossano / Tricia Huguelet vs Pamela Schmidt / Barbara Woodward1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-07-08vs BP REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Weese / Sue Gallagher vs Alison Shaw / Katie Shaw2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Wither vs Judith Law2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Rossano / Julia McVey vs Katie Todd / Donna Cash6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTricia Huguelet / Jessica Irwin vs Sylvia Johansen / Helen Peterman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-01vs HIW GOLDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSusan Weese / Sue Gallagher vs Mieke Scripps / Palmira Miner1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichele Castle vs Laura Billups6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Rossano / Valerie VanAlsburg vs Emily Lenich / Sue Speyer6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTricia Huguelet / Jessica Irwin vs Doreen Evans / Nicole Reyes6-7, 1-6
2021-06-24vs MC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Rossano / Stephanie Joens vs Peggy Hofstra / Kristin Harvey6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKatie Wither / Margy Wilson vs Ana Bland / Michelle Workman4-6, 3-6
2021-06-17vs NJ NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStephanie Joens / Catherine Rossano vs Heidi Warriner / Kathy Peterson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichele Castle vs Christy Carello3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulia McVey / Valerie VanAlsburg vs Mary Bare / Natalie Cervera6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Weese / Katie Wither vs Lee Duhl / Cynthia Snavely3-6, 5-7
2021-06-10vs EPR NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Joens / Catherine Rossano vs Karen Morris / Susan Whatley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Wither vs Jennifer Halboth7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Weese / Audi Lundy vs Kellie Bonthron / Gwen Riley6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValerie VanAlsburg / Julia McVey vs Alima Blackwell / Linda Strauss6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Stephanie Joens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Catherine Rossano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Katie Wither
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Sue Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Julia McVey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Valerie VanAlsburg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Susan Weese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Michele Castle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Audi Lundy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Irwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Margy Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tricia Huguelet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Rossano + Stephanie Joens241157% games+6.7% vs expected
Valerie VanAlsburg + Julia McVey7461% games−0.6% vs expected
Sue Gallagher + Susan Weese81047% games−3.1% vs expected
Jessica Irwin + Stephanie Joens404 matchesnot enough data
Valerie VanAlsburg + Susan Weese314 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Rossano + Julia McVey404 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Joens + Susan Weese224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Irwin + Tricia Huguelet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Joens
65W–28L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Catherine Rossano
46W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
Katie Wither
19W–21L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Sue Gallagher
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Julia McVey
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Valerie VanAlsburg
52W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Susan Weese
55W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
Michele Castle
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.85
Audi Lundy
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Jessica Irwin
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Margy Wilson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Tricia Huguelet
28W–7L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.